I often travel with a Macbook Air because it is small, light, and I can fit it in my camera bag. The downside of my computer is that it has such a small storage capacity. I discovered something today that concerns me. When you upload images from iPhoto to Flickr, you evidently cannot delete the images from your computer or the online images will also be deleted. I am not certain I understand the logic of this connection but Apple says it is true. I hope I have always read the fine print, but now I am concerned.
I understand the importance of a backup and the understanding that online storage alone does not count as a backup. My strategy is to upload twice – once to Flickr and once to Trovebox. Why must I also keep my collection of photos on one of my computers?
Project Noah combines my interest in field biology and photography. The concept is that amateurs upload photographs they have taken and are willing to share. I limit my uploads to images I have taken at our Wisconsin cabin. Photos can be identified or not (the small frog photo I just uploaded I think is an immature Gray Tree Frog, but this is a guess). Others can respond with additional information. There are special challenges and options for educators.
Project Noah offers apps for iOS and android encouraging the use of phones for photography.
Educators who live in the Apple world have known about and perhaps used Explain Everything since 2011. It was just announced that this app is now available for Windows 8.1.
For those unfamiliar with this software, here is my early description of the original version for the iPad. This is a multimedia development environment that can be used productively by authors of a wide range of age and skill.
I hate when companies change their terminology. Why is this necessary when pretty much everything remains the same? It makes what I write seem dated.
OK – ignore this mini-rant. If you use online Google services, you may have noticed people starting to use the phrases “Google docs” and “Google drive” to refer to what you thought was a single thing. Here is a video from the Lynda.com collection that explains the actual differences. Yes, Lynda is a paid service, but sometimes segments are made available at no cost. This is one of those times (BTW – I am a big Lynda fan).
e-Rate pioneers (Washington Post story) are concerned with the direction FCC is proposing for the e-rate.
The lawmakers object to how the FCC has suggested funding WiFi upgrades in schools and libraries according to a per-student or per-square-foot formula, arguing that it unfairly allocates more money to large and wealthy institutions over smaller, poorer ones where the need may be greater.
There is also the issue on whether e-rate funding should be increased with board members weighing in along party lines.
We are moving and that means we need to clear out our stuff so we can sell our house. This is not a fun process, but it does lead to the rediscovery of interesting stuff.
So, you digital natives, here is a one item quiz. What is this? I have covered up the name, but some clues are still available. It is an Apple product and it includes a stylus.
I admit I did not know. This was one of those products Cindy used.
I could make this a weekly feature for a couple of months. What Apple computer weighed in at approximately 60 pounds (the molar mac). I hauled that monster up from the basement by myself. Not bad for an old man.
The recent reactions of many, including me, to the news that Facebook was trying to manipulate user emotions got me thinking. Why was I offended? I sometimes play a certain type of music to manipulate my mood – mellow music, energizing music, somber music. I think the difference is that I know I am attempting to manipulate my mood and I am doing this because my actual psychological state is not what I desire. My awareness of what is going on allows me to keep track of reality. When another entity does this without my awareness I am being mislead. I am unaware that I am being manipulated.
This lack of awareness seems similar to the issue raised by Eli Pariser in the Filter Bubble. He claimed that Google uses our reaction to search results to adjust the type of information we see. However, there can often be a difference between what I want to hear and reality. I may want to think I appear young and athletic, but being told this when these are not the facts could get me in trouble. That hike into the Grand Canyon might be a foolish thing to attempt unless I am actually up to the task. I need to know when the information I seek represents an accurate picture of reality. Being told what I wish were the case is not necessarily the same thing.
This is when insight into the algorithm responsible for what we experience is important. I used to think the Google search algorithm was based on page rank. Pariser challenged this view. The recent revelations regarding Facebook now also cause me to question my understanding of the newsfeed. I understand the competitive advantage keeping the actual algorithm secret offers a business advantage, but I should be able to be assured that the view of reality I am experiencing is the view of reality that I expect.
Looking for online learning opportunities? Summer (or Fall) online and off line coding activities for K-8 students are available from Code.org.
I have written multiple times regarding the inequity in home access. Here is an interesting attempt to respond – libraries lending hotspots.
The description of digital natives (sorry, I use the popular terminology) as multi-taskers and concerns that multitasking can lead to disastrous consequences (texting and driving) get a lot of coverage while often lacking a scientific evaluation. The known limitations of short term (working) memory have always been enough for me. Some scientists have taken a more direct approach and are attempting to determine whether a cohort or individuals do have this capability.
Here is a recent description of some researchers work (Scientific American) including an online task you can try.