e-Rate pioneers (Washington Post story) are concerned with the direction FCC is proposing for the e-rate.
The lawmakers object to how the FCC has suggested funding WiFi upgrades in schools and libraries according to a per-student or per-square-foot formula, arguing that it unfairly allocates more money to large and wealthy institutions over smaller, poorer ones where the need may be greater.
There is also the issue on whether e-rate funding should be increased with board members weighing in along party lines.
We are moving and that means we need to clear out our stuff so we can sell our house. This is not a fun process, but it does lead to the rediscovery of interesting stuff.
So, you digital natives, here is a one item quiz. What is this? I have covered up the name, but some clues are still available. It is an Apple product and it includes a stylus.
I admit I did not know. This was one of those products Cindy used.
I could make this a weekly feature for a couple of months. What Apple computer weighed in at approximately 60 pounds (the molar mac). I hauled that monster up from the basement by myself. Not bad for an old man.
Posted inUncategorized|Comments Off on Mysteries from my basement
The recent reactions of many, including me, to the news that Facebook was trying to manipulate user emotions got me thinking. Why was I offended? I sometimes play a certain type of music to manipulate my mood – mellow music, energizing music, somber music. I think the difference is that I know I am attempting to manipulate my mood and I am doing this because my actual psychological state is not what I desire. My awareness of what is going on allows me to keep track of reality. When another entity does this without my awareness I am being mislead. I am unaware that I am being manipulated.
This lack of awareness seems similar to the issue raised by Eli Pariser in the Filter Bubble. He claimed that Google uses our reaction to search results to adjust the type of information we see. However, there can often be a difference between what I want to hear and reality. I may want to think I appear young and athletic, but being told this when these are not the facts could get me in trouble. That hike into the Grand Canyon might be a foolish thing to attempt unless I am actually up to the task. I need to know when the information I seek represents an accurate picture of reality. Being told what I wish were the case is not necessarily the same thing.
This is when insight into the algorithm responsible for what we experience is important. I used to think the Google search algorithm was based on page rank. Pariser challenged this view. The recent revelations regarding Facebook now also cause me to question my understanding of the newsfeed. I understand the competitive advantage keeping the actual algorithm secret offers a business advantage, but I should be able to be assured that the view of reality I am experiencing is the view of reality that I expect.
The description of digital natives (sorry, I use the popular terminology) as multi-taskers and concerns that multitasking can lead to disastrous consequences (texting and driving) get a lot of coverage while often lacking a scientific evaluation. The known limitations of short term (working) memory have always been enough for me. Some scientists have taken a more direct approach and are attempting to determine whether a cohort or individuals do have this capability.
Here is a recent description of some researchers work (Scientific American) including an online task you can try.
Posted inUncategorized|Comments Off on So you think you can multitask
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button.
You must be logged in to post a comment.