Ulterior motives in the “governing” of education

It is election day and in some cases it appears that political offices are contested with a strong emphasis on differences of opinion in how children should be educated. The high profile examples are typically in large cities and are not about those wanting to gain office as a member of the school board, but mayors making a pitch for one or another approach to education. Like many political processes outside money comes to bear in supporting the various candidates and it can be difficult to understand just why this money is being made available. Is it really about educating the children? Why is this an issue in urban areas, but not in most smaller communities where the mayor’s position on educational policy is seldom an issue? If you read Ravitch (and I have), she suggests that contrary to the typical argument that underperforming schools are the result of underperforming faculty, she suggests that the issues are far broader and deal with general issues of poverty and lack of social support. Her message is that blaming the schools is actually a way to provide those unaffected by poor life circumstances even more advantages often rewarding the business sector in the process. The sample news of the day from Boston captures this dispute quite accurately.

Both candidates say their policies are aimed at closing the achievement gap separating white students from blacks and Latinos.

And their fight mirrors, in some respects, a roiling, decades-long national debate over how best to address that gap.

The market-based reform movement has, for years now, had a strong hold on the education establishment. It infused President George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind law and President Obama’s Race to the Top legislation.

Its patrons include Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has funded reform efforts across the country, and some of the country’s highest profile mayors: New York’s Michael Bloomberg and Chicago’s Rahm Emanuel among them.

But the movement has spawned strong critics, too — none so forceful as New York University professor Diane Ravitch, who served in President George H.W. Bush’s administration and initially embraced standards-based reform.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Ulterior motives in the “governing” of education

Google Site Tutorials

Karen Ferguson offers a nice (and current) set of tutorials (video and text) for Google Sites. I am still a fan of web sites and Google Sites offers educators and students this possibility.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Google Site Tutorials

Android under patent attacks

This from GigaOm on a legal complaint claiming patent violations in android. This claim, if supported, would adversely impact Google and Samsung. The patents were purchased from Nortel (now out of business). This a classic case of patents that are more than a dozen years from a company that no longer exists being used as a weapon by new companies. The legal challenge is being brought in a rural Texas district known to be in agreement with claims of a similar nature. Whether confirmed long term or not, these complaints will cost millions to work through the system.

Google search methodology also involved in dispute

The complaint against Google involves six patents, all from the same patent “family.” They’re all titled “associative search engine” and list Richard Skillen and Prescott Livermore as inventors. The patents describe “an advertisement machine which provides advertisements to a user searching for desired information within a data network.”  (arstechnica)

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Android under patent attacks

Conclusions drawn from international examination scores

I have been reading Diane Ravitch’s Reign of Error  in which Ravitch attacks many politicized positions on public education. Her core concern is the privatization of public education and Ravitch disputes multiple complaints against public education based on what she feels are faulty data and flawed research methodologies. A favorite data source appears to be the NAEP (the National Assessment of Educational Progress) which she argues has useful characteristics in that it offers International data over time and it is not a high stakes test. Ravitch argues that many claims made about the failures of U.S. are actually failures in addressing needs created by poverty an important variable which schools cannot easily address. I have become sensitized to references to poverty and the NAEP.

Today I noticed a post by Scott McLeod abstracting comments from a lengthy post by Jonathan Lovell  focused on income inequality and student achievement. You can read these posts using the links provided here. The point made is that the U.S. sample in international comparisons oversamples low income students and when adjustments are made statistically “re-weighting” the samples from various countries, the U.S. ranking among nations improves greatly (this is the same argument Ravitch makes).

The source cited for this statistical adjustment is a study by economists Carnoy and Rothstien. I have already identified the gist of their findings. However, in looking through their paper, I located something else I found interesting. The authors contend that the “educational policy advocates” made premature judgment regarding what these results meant (arguing the U.S. scored poorly) and a more careful analysis reveals a much more optimistic picture. They are careful to avoid assigning motives for this rush to judgment.

For some reason, however, although TIMSS released its average national results in December, it scheduled release of the international database for five weeks later. This puzzling strategy ensured that policymakers and commentators would draw quick and perhaps misleading interpretations from the results. This is especially the case because analysis of the international database takes time, and headlines from the initial release are likely to be sealed in conventional wisdom by the time scholars have had the opportunity to complete a careful study.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Conclusions drawn from international examination scores

School reponsibility for after hours online behavior

This NYTimes articles examine the dilemma schools face in addressing student online behavior when students are not in the school environment.

“It’s going to be more and more of legal issues,” said Gretchen Shipley, a lawyer who represents school districts. “The ability to monitor is growing so quickly.”

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on School reponsibility for after hours online behavior

What is the point of a model?

The SAMR model – After reading some descriptions of SAMR, I have a question. Who is intended to be the user of this model? Is SAMR one of those ways of explaining a phenomenon to anyone who might be interested; e.g., information processing model of cognitive psychology? Is it a way of capturing a common pattern of change in a specific area much in the way the way classic “diffusion of innovation model” describes a general pattern of adoption (if I remember correctly, the original example to explain the diffusion model was the adoption of hybrid seed corn). The diffusion model does not necessarily explain what should be done to encourage adoption. Hence, substitute technology in education for hybrid seed corn in agriculture and you have SAMR? By now the “early adopters” may have reached the stage of “modification” while the laggards have yet to achieve “substitution”.

It makes most sense to me as a guide for “coaches” and “facilitators” – as in, try making this kind of change and then we will move on to something requiring a greater leap. As such, it has principles of Vygotsky’s “zone of proximal development” as a guide for the guide – push the learner beyond the present comfort zone, but not beyond what they can conceptualize.

Sorry – if this is completely new. SAMR – substitution, augmentation, modification, redefinition. I would describe SAMR as a description of ways in which a traditional instructional practices might be modified through the sue of technology.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on What is the point of a model?