Blurts

The NY Times have an article on web sites that allow teachers to sell lesson plans. Interesting. I wonder how this will impact collaborative sites through which teachers share their materials (e.g., ATT WebQuests)? I wonder if this situation will raise copyright concerns? So many ideas are similar and so many resources are already available. You cannot really offer a sample because the initial view is all that is really needed.

Google has added a filtering capability to its search service. It is easy enough to implement – 1) open settings and and locate SafeSearch 2) select Lock SafeSearch and 3) enter your Google password and lock select the lock SafeSearch button.

Does this mean I can control the search filtering on any computer I want? I assume this works when a user does not first log into a Google account that has not been locked.

Amazon has announced that Kindle for PC (the windows kind, not the personal computer) is available. Of course, the Kindle for the Touch/iPhone has been available for some time. Software is free, books are not.

Kindle For PC screencapture – size has been altered. Also proof I will use a Windows app.

This is a great site for those interested in blogging (or site development) with WordPress. This has been my platform of choice nearly from the beginning.

i just encountered this article describing how some students in Sweden are allowed to access the Internet while taking exams. Cindy has been doing this for several semesters. I have done it as well. I refuse to do it anymore. My concern is not that students will cheat, by concern is that they will not prepare. I have data.

I run courses from my own sever and using content I have written. Among other capabilities, I can create a situation in which students must login to view content and this offers the opportunity to track when and what they study. Here is the reality I observed. When students become experienced with a system that allows them to explore online while answering questions a change in their preparation occurs. Many simply stop preparing. They come to class, but access information they need to answer examination questions (not rote retention by any stretch of the imagination) while taking exams. My major exams take several hours and focus on applications that require extensive writing to communicate. The “down side” as it turns out is that in offering an assessment process that takes some time (a couple of hours) there is time for some who choose to take this approach to also read content for the first time. Offering open access and focusing on tasks that require time to develop also offers flexibility allowing students to play the system. Some might call this “just in time learning”. Not exactly cheating, but hardly a commitment to meaningful learning. A 50 item multiple choice exam in 50 minutes would have suffered less as a measure of actual understanding. Too much in such a case to look up for the first time.

Assessment is complex. I offer this example because many have simplistic knee-jerk reactions – memorization bad, multiple choice testing bad. Perhaps – failure to prepare also bad.

Baffled by Twitter lists? This set of suggestions from Dopodomani offers useful suggestions.

I do think lists was a good way to extend the usefuness of Twitter. The opportunity to identify topical areas and perhaps generate feeds associated with specific areas seems valuable.