McCain on Thursday introduced the Internet Freedom Act, which would keep the FCC from enacting rules prohibiting broadband providers from selectively blocking or slowing Internet content and applications.
Why? Net Neutrality would require “onerous” government regulation.
If I live in a location with few options (e.g., North Dakota), I feel I need someone to regulate what a provider does. I do not consider dial up an option if I disagree with the policies of my provider. My provider seems to be able to get digital content to my television and phone without a problem. What is the issue in getting content to my computer?
From the same MacWorld article. The following comment from ND Senator Dorgan:
“Network neutrality protects the fundamental rights of Americans in using the Internet and accessing content, applications, and services of their choice. A well-reasoned network neutrality policy also ensures a level playing field for companies large and small as they create an online presence, and will continue to foster the entrepreneurial innovation found not only in corporate office suites, but in college dorms across the country.”—Statement from Senators Byron Dorgan, a North Dakota Democrat, and Olympia Snowe, Maine Republican
nnCatch the title of the bill “Internet Freedom Act”. I guess the accuracy of this title depends on who you think should be free. The provider (I emphasize the singular in my situation) or the consumers.