Photo sharing

I came across this article from Forbes that is kind of a mix of a complaint focused mostly on the business model of Facebook/Instagram and a promotion of the photo sharing service – Waldo. The article is worth your time if you are interested in either topic.

I have not heard of Waldo, but from article I have learned that is a privacy first, photo service originally focused on photo collections for schools, camps, and sports teams. The article itself is more focused on individual and family sharing and explains that Waldo is expanding its reach to offer services to families.

I am interested in photo sharing as an individual and for classrooms. I have paid for Flickr for years and have used it both to share photos publicly and store others privately. I also use Google Photos and share an album with family members. I do share some photos on Instagram, but don’t really use this service heavily.

The issue of cost always comes up. The cost to a school for Waldo is about $1000 for the base model (12,000 images per year). The cost for an individual account is $5 per month for 5 gigabytes of storage. My Flickr account costs more, but I have over a terabyte of images.

Here is a resource listing photo sharing options. Google photo sharing is included and I am glad to see that Google is not listed as a free service. Photos are included within your total Google storage limit which can be substantial if you also use Google Drive and Gmail. 100 GB a month is $2.

I c0ntribute images to a federated service Pixelfed. I am a member of the instance pixelfed.social. This is social in that images are shared for viewing and commenting, but the focus is on sharing in a general sense and not just sharing with family members. One could use this service as a private account sharing only with certain members of your instance, but I don’t bother. My account has a 6 gigabyte limit, but this would allow me to store quite a few images for a free account if I wanted to use it only for private storage.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Photo sharing

Layering categories

Richard Byrne who writes the Free Tech 4 Teachers blog and I seem to have similar interests. In a recent post, he describes three services that allow an educator to add questions to a video. The idea is to encourage students thinking about what they will or have seen. This addition of question prompts to a video is an example of a process I describe as layering. There are different types of content that services allow you to layer on top of online content. Questions added to video or web pages are a good example and depending on the service one might also highlight, annotate, link, and embed a discussion opportunity. Again, depending on the service layering can be applied by the educator, student, or both.

I ask educators to recognize three different types of service that provide layering opportunities – the company owns the content and provides the layering service, the company owns the layering service and invites the educator to upload content to be layered, and the company provides a way to layer additions to content offered by a different company. My focus in the Primer I link to above is on the final category. The distinctions are important. For example, one would not necessarily have the rights necessary to take a video from one source and then upload it into the service provided by a different company (category 2). What I describe as category three involves those services that serve content from the original and layering service in a combined way that takes into account the rights of the content creator.

Byrne offers three examples one of which I would describe as Category 3 (Edpuzzle), one of which involves content authored by the educator (Screencastify), and one of which I would describe as Category 1 (Classhook). I tend to focus mainly on categories 2 and 3, but I did make the effort to explore Classhook.

Classhook offers users access to digital content organized in multiple ways (topic, standard) and offers teachers the opportunity to add “pause prompts” to this content and then assign the resulting instructional content to learners. Perusal and Amazon would be an example of a company that offers a layering opportunity for text content – buy the book and then layer highlights and annotations. Classhook does allow the uploads of video content and I used this option to upload a YouTube video I had created to explore the service. Depending on the rights expected by the content creator this would not be a good thing to do with content created by someone else. I assume this is why Classhook has already secured rights for the content it offers and focuses on this material.

So, the way Classhook works, the educator selects a video and then adds “pause prompts” at designated locations within the timeline of the video. When a learner plays the video, the video pauses at the designated time providing time for the learner to consider the question.

Classhook offers a free option for educators wanting to explore its service. For educators wanting to use the service on a regular basis, the cost is $9 a month with a discount if access is purchased for the year.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Layering categories

50 Year Anniversary of Oregon Trail

I recently wrote a post describing the most recent offering of the Oregon Trail. Those of us working in the midwest who participated in the early days of classroom uses of technology are likely to have a special fondness for this “game”. My wife and I used to drive to Minneapolis from Grand Forks, ND, to be part of MECC (Minnesota Educational Computer Consortium) because it was a way to meet others with a similar passion and to pick up the software offered through this organization.

This recent KSMP story traces the 50-year history of the game and its origin with three Minnesota teachers who translated a board game developed by one of the teachers into a simple digital game. The story explains how MECC kind of launched Oregon Trail into wide visibility.

The originators did not make a dime – kind of the OER of that time.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on 50 Year Anniversary of Oregon Trail

Windows 11 SE vs. Chromebooks

I think Microsoft just announced hardware and a modified version of Windows 11 (Windows SE) to challenge Chromebooks in Education. The company was promoting Surface laptops under $250. I had read a Chromebook columnist predicting this possibility and watched the MicroSoft Education Reimagined announcement as a consequence. My wife and I serve on a community technology advisory committee for our local school district. They use chromebooks in the lower grades and Windows machines in secondary. MicroSoft at all levels could offer a more convenient approach. Is MicroSoft’s productivity suite the equivalent of Google Classroom? What about other apps designed to run in the browser. This could get interested and K12 students may benefit from the competition.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Windows 11 SE vs. Chromebooks

Competency is mastery by another name

The Office of Educational Technology provides resources and information to educators covering multiple topics that may involve technology. Here is a link to a comment on state-by-state implementation of Competence-Based Education. The links from this resource allow educators from different states to consider how their state is advancing in efforts to base K12 programs on a competency approach.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Competency is mastery by another name

Kahoot backstory

When I ask educators in classes I work with to demonstrate a technology tool they work find useful, Kahoot always seems to be one of the requests. I have explored Kahoot myself. I have worked with technology in education since this was possible and perhaps because of this personal history I find the backstory of those who have developed successful hardware and software of great interest. If you are a Kahoot user, you may find this article from CNBC describing the history of Kahoot to be of interest.

Loading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Kahoot backstory